Skip to the page

A private mathematics education · ages 4 to 18

Mathematics, properly taught, and honestly measured.

From first counting to the edge of university. The clearest methods of the Russian and American traditions, the evidence behind every one of them, and a plain account of what your child has truly learned. Fifteen calm minutes a day.

The full app, free for 14 days. No account, nothing to install. After that, 100 founding families, by application, for the first year. Apply

Leo has three times as many stamps as Mira. Together they have 48. How many does Mira have?

Mira?Leo48

Four equal units make 48, so one unit, Mira’s share, is 12.

Plate I Draw the problem before solving it. Both traditions · strong evidence for the mechanism

The two traditions

Russian depth, American breadth. Each where it is stronger.

Russia’s pupils rank among the best in the world on curriculum tests and only average on unfamiliar, applied problems. American schools are stronger at data, modeling and fractions as numbers; Russian schools go further in geometry, algebra and proof. On most of school mathematics the two go equally deep: 160 of 271 concepts in our comparison. We take each where the evidence favors it, and say which is which.

ABC
A = B + C, read from strips of paper before any numbers. After Davydov.

From the Russian tradition

Comparing amounts before counting them. Every word problem drawn as parts and a whole. The equals sign as balance, and letters for unknowns long before algebra. A few minutes of mixed recall to open each session. Proof, for every child, from about thirteen.

01¾
Where ¾ lives: a number with a place, not a slice of pie.

From the American tradition

Fractions placed on the number line, the single highest-leverage idea in school arithmetic. The meaning behind the sign rules. Data and probability through simulation and natural frequencies. Functions in several representations, and open modeling of real situations.

27?45
The bar model: a whole, a known part, and the part we are looking for.

Where they agree: Concord

A worked example first, then half-worked, then the child alone. Explaining each step in one’s own words. Practice that is mixed and spaced, not massed. Bar models for word problems. Most of the method is here, and that is as it should be.

  • 44school concepts Russia’s standard course brings to fluency and the US standard track does not
  • 17the other way, mostly data, functions and modeling
  • 0years: the median difference in when the two first introduce an idea. Depth differs, not timing.

Sources: TIMSS 2019 (Russia 567 and 543, US 535 and 515 at grades 4 and 8); PISA 2018 (Russia 488). Concept counts computed from the Russian Math Atlas coverage data, 271 school concepts. Explore the Russian Math Atlas.

Three ways into each flagship lesson

Seen, used and proved.

Each of our 38 flagship lessons opens three ways. We lead with the one your child engages with most and always offer all three. These are not “learning styles”, an idea the research does not support; several representations help every child.

The other 233 school concepts begin as a guided brief, without the three lenses, and the app always says which you are looking at. More lessons are being written.

  1. See itthe picture
    01¾

    Three quarters is a point on the line, three of four equal steps from 0 to 1.

  2. Use itin the world

    A recipe for four needs ¾ of a cup of flour. You are cooking for two. How much now, and how do you measure it?

  3. Prove itwhy it is true

    34=3×14

    Cut the unit into four equal parts. Three of them, laid end to end, reach three quarters of the way to 1. So ¾ is less than 1, and ⁴⁄₄ is exactly 1.

    From about thirteen, every learner writes short justifications like this, gently checked.

The hallmarks

Every choice is marked. Including the weak ones.

Like the assay mark on silver, a small stamp on every teaching choice tells you where it comes from. Open it and you see one sentence of why, and the strength of the evidence behind it.

Most of school mathematics has never been tested method against method. Where it has, we follow the evidence. Where it has not, we say so.

Evidence behind our 271 concept decisions
Strong evidence8Randomized trials or meta-analyses of the mechanism
Moderate evidence78Consistent studies, smaller or less controlled
Weak evidence166Expert judgment or established curricular practice, without a controlled test
Anecdotal19Individual reports or tradition only; not studied
Russian tradition

113 choices

American tradition

61 choices

Concord

97 choices

Honest mastery

We would rather say “not yet known” than flatter.

Every idea begins as unknown. Nothing is called secure on one good day. The shape of each mark carries its meaning, so “credited” can never be mistaken for “secure”.

  1. Not yet seen. No evidence yetNo evidence yet. Where every idea starts.
  2. Credited, not yet verified. Credited by placement because a later idea was shown; not yet verifiedA harder idea was shown in placement, so this one is credited and quietly checked later. Never shown as secure. Four foundations are never credited at all.
  3. Started. Has met this ideaMet in a lesson.
  4. Practicing. Practicing; not yet secureWorking on it, with evidence accumulating.
  5. Secure. Secure across formats and sessionsAt least six real attempts, two kinds of question, two sessions a day apart, an estimate of 95% or more, and the last three right without hints. Fast guesses and revealed answers do not count.
  6. Mastered. Mastered: secure, transferred, and remembered after a weekSecure, then applied to a real-world or proof question, and remembered a week later.

0.8–2.6%

of the concepts our placement credited were not truly known, in three simulated scenarios of 1,000 learners each. Measured per learner, 3.6–10.1% of simulated children had at least one concept credited in error, about one in ten in the gappiest scenario. That is why every credit stays marked “not yet verified” and is checked in later warm-ups.

These figures come from a simulation with research-default parameters, not from real children, and they describe placement credit only, not the Secure mark. No child has yet completed a year with us. The founding year includes an outcome study.

The weekly brief

A letter, not a dashboard.

Each week, a few sentences in plain English: time spent, what is newly secure, the one idea in progress and why, what is still unknown, and one question to ask at dinner. Open any status to see the evidence behind it.

Your child sees exactly what you see. We write sooner only when something changes course.

Illustrative sample · not a real child

Week of 28 September

A steady week. Four sessions, one idea newly secure. Ask her where ¾ and ⅗ sit on a line, and which is larger.

  • Fractions as numbersSecure. Secure across formats and sessions
  • Comparing fractionsPracticing. Practicing; not yet secure
  • Place value to 1,000Credited. Credited by placement because a later idea was shown; not yet verified
  • Subtraction with regroupingNot yet seen. No evidence yet

We have not yet seen enough to judge subtraction with regrouping. It will appear in next week’s warm-ups.

A glimpse

Fifteen minutes you can defend at dinner.

A short warm-up of older ideas, one new idea, practice pitched so a child succeeds about three times in four, and a one-minute close. Then it stops.

  • No coins, badges or leaderboards
  • No streaks to lose, no guilt notifications
  • No advertising, ever
  • Your child’s progress stays on your device

Drawn by the app’s own components and visual models.

The alternatives, fairly

Good options exist. Here is what each is for.

A great tutor is a person no software replaces. RSM is a strong weekly class for a child who enjoys a group. AoPS is the best route for a self-motivated child drawn to competition mathematics. We are the daily spine underneath any of them, and the honest record of what has been learned.

OptionFormatTypical cost a yearWhat you learn about progress
Elite private tutorOne to one, weekly$12,000–24,000+ per childThe tutor’s account
Russian School of MathematicsWeekly class of about 12up to about $4,000 per childGrades and teacher conversations
MathnasiumCenter sessions, 2–3 a week$1,500–5,000 per childPeriodic assessments
ThinksterApp and a tutor, weekly$1,170–2,340 per childA dashboard and mastery map
AoPS online classesLive online courses$830–990 per childHomework grades and feedback
Math AcademyAdaptive self-study$588 per childCourse progress
0 to 100Fifteen minutes a day at home, a weekly letter, a review each term$2,400, the whole familySecure, developing, unknown, and why, every week

Prices checked 4 October 2026 and vary by location. Tutor rates: Private Prep (Aug 2026). RSM: Harvard Crimson (Oct 2025); RSM sends official prices on request. Mathnasium: MyEngineeringBuddy (Jul 2026). Thinkster, AoPS, Math Academy: their own pages. Yearly figures are our arithmetic on those prices: a tutor one hour a week for 40 weeks; Mathnasium ($150–500 a month) for ten months; AoPS two courses ($415–495 each); Thinkster one session a week for 52 weeks; Math Academy twelve months. Their prices are per child; ours covers every child in the family. A teacher offers a person; we offer daily practice and an honest record, and many families will want both.

The Founding Families

One hundred families, because each one gets a real conversation.

For the first year we are limiting membership to 100 families. The reason is practical: every family speaks with us before their child begins, and we are calibrating the mastery model on real learners before we widen access.

Membership
$2,400 a year, the whole familyEvery child, held for as long as you remain members. Annual only. No discounts, ever.
At launch
38 flagship lessons in three lenses. Every one of the 271 school concepts mapped, with a guided brief; practice questions for 92 of them. More lessons are being written, and every screen says which kind you are looking at.
You receive
A 45-minute conversation with a mathematician-educator before your child begins, a review each term, and the printed Field Guide to the Method.
We ask
Twenty minutes of honest feedback each term. Separately, and only if you agree, use of anonymized learning data to improve the system and to study whether it works.

Apply for a founding place

Leave your email and we will write to you personally, usually within a week. We store only your email and the age band you choose, outside the public website, and delete them whenever you ask.

Or write to hello@0to100math.com. A person reads every request.

Questions

Asked, and answered plainly.

Is this “Russian math”?

It is a method that draws on two traditions and marks which is which. The Russian tradition we use is a body of teaching ideas (Davydov, Kolmogorov, the math-circle culture), much of it brought to America by émigré teachers from across the former Soviet Union. It is not a state or its politics. We use the American tradition just as deliberately.

Will this get my child into a particular school?

We do not know, and we will not claim it. No one can honestly promise admission. We can promise a secure foundation, a habit of explaining one’s reasoning, and a true record of what has been learned.

Will it put pressure on my child?

We designed against it. No streaks, leaderboards, coins or countdowns. Praise is for reasoning, never for being clever. When a child struggles, the system goes back to repair a foundation rather than pushing on, and the brief tells you.

What is the evidence that this works?

For the method, it is on every hallmark, weak grades included. For the product itself there is none yet, because no child has completed a year with us. The founding year includes an outcome study, so that we can show you evidence about ourselves.

What happens to my child’s data?

Your child’s name, answers and progress stay on your device. To improve the site we count how it is used: which pages are read, which buttons are pressed, how many sessions are finished and which ideas become secure. Those counts go to our own server and to Google Analytics, with no names, nothing typed, and no advertising features. If you request a founding place, we link that request to this browser’s visit counts, to learn what helped you decide. To switch this off in a browser, open this link.

My child already attends RSM, AoPS or a tutor. Instead, or as well?

Either. Many families will keep a teacher they value and use 0 to 100 as the daily practice and honest record underneath. If you stop something, it should be because the record shows you can.